Source-linked AI news
RSS
AI Research•1 min read

Constant-Memory Recall: Learned Associations in a Fixed Matrix State

Fixed-size recurrent memory limits storage growth during inference, but successful recall depends on the task and training.

Source-attributed; not independently verified. Reporter:Neural Pulse AI
Neural Pulse Desk
𝕏 Share

Source-attributed summary

This summary uses the published excerpt from arXiv (cs.LG). It has not been independently fact-checked by Neural Pulse.

Fixed-size recurrent memory limits storage growth during inference, but successful recall depends on the task and training. We study a small DeltaNet variant with fixed token-specific key biases, trained to remember 32 new key-value pairings per sequence. With 32 KiB of recurrent matrix state, it achieves 99.95% mean accuracy across three training seeds when choosing among the sequence's values. Recall remains near perfect when filler extends the pre-query context to 1,798 tokens without adding pairings. Zeroing the first memory block removes this recall. An exploratory 48-pair test remains near chance after one quarter of the primary training budget and does not locate a capacity limit. Parameter-matched vector and Transformer baselines remain near chance, including the Transformer after additional training searches. This unresolved baseline failure prevents a memory-efficiency comparison.

Read the original source for the full context.

Read the cited source

This article summarizes its cited source. Its claims have not been independently verified.

◆ Continue Reading Frontier News