World Editing: Intervening on Executable Worlds at Increasing Depth
Interactive world models are increasingly capable of generating environments and acting within them, yet deliberately editing an existing executable world remains underexplored.
Source-attributed summary
This summary uses the published excerpt from arXiv (cs.AI). It has not been independently fact-checked by Neural Pulse.
Interactive world models are increasingly capable of generating environments and acting within them, yet deliberately editing an existing executable world remains underexplored. We formulate world editing as intervening on an existing world while preserving properties that should remain unchanged, and introduce intervention depth as an axis describing how strongly an edit couples world entities, dynamics, and systems. We instantiate this capability through industry-grade game modding and introduce IGMWorld, together with IGMBench, a benchmark of 110 tasks and over 1.1K executable state and behavioral criteria across Minecraft and Terraria. The tasks span property, entity, dynamics, and system interventions and are evaluated through deterministic executability, behavioral, preservation, and visual checks. Frontier coding agents already exhibit substantial world-editing capability: the strongest configuration solves 78.2% of tasks under a strict task-level criterion, while criterion-level performance reaches 94.8%. Reliability generally decreases with intervention depth, and this pattern persists even among tasks with similar numbers of evaluation criteria.
Read the original source for the full context.
Read the cited source
This article summarizes its cited source. Its claims have not been independently verified.